People v. Oliver

162 A.D.2d 1057, 559 N.Y.S.2d 208, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9883

This text of 162 A.D.2d 1057 (People v. Oliver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Oliver, 162 A.D.2d 1057, 559 N.Y.S.2d 208, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9883 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant failed to object to the statements of an unidentified police officer at sentencing and thereby failed to preserve the issue for review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Castro, 70 NY2d 943). In any event the information the officer related to the court was included in the presentence investigation report which the court had reviewed prior to sentencing. On this record, the court’s sentence was not excessive. (Appeal from judgment of Cayuga County Court, Contiguglia, J.—criminal possession of controlled substance, fourth degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Balio and Lowery, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Castro
519 N.E.2d 614 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 A.D.2d 1057, 559 N.Y.S.2d 208, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-oliver-nyappdiv-1990.