People v. Cash

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Cash

242 A.D.2d 976, 664 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10650

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 30, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 242 A.D.2d 976 (People v. Cash) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Cash, 242 A.D.2d 976, 664 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10650 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for permission to proceed as poor person denied. Memorandum: Defendant purports to appeal from an order of County Court determining, pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA), that he is a level three sex offender. Except when the issue is raised on appeal from a judgment of conviction, a classification determination pursuant to SORA may not be challenged on appeal (see, People v Lyday, 241 AD2d 950; see also, People v Freeman, 236 AD2d 897; People v Stevens, 235 AD2d 440, lv granted 90 NY2d 864). The proper procedure for challenging a classification determination under SORA is a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. No such proceeding [977]*977has been commenced in this case. Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Hayes, Doerr and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for permission to proceed as poor person denied. Memorandum: Defendant purports to appeal from an order of County Court determining, pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA), that he is a level three sex offender. Except when the issue is raised on appeal from a judgment of conviction, a classification determination pursuant to SORA may not be challenged on appeal (see, People v Lyday, 241 AD2d 950; see also, People v Freeman, 236 AD2d 897; People v Stevens, 235 AD2d 440, lv granted 90 NY2d 864). The proper procedure for challenging a classification determination under SORA is a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. No such proceeding [977]*977has been commenced in this case. Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Hayes, Doerr and Fallon, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 A.D.2d 976, 664 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cash-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack