People v. Cash

242 A.D.2d 976, 664 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10650
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 30, 1997·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Motion for permission to proceed as poor person denied. Memorandum: Defendant purports to appeal from an order of County Court determining, pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA), that he is a level three sex offender. Except when the issue is raised on appeal from a judgment of conviction, a classification determination pursuant to SORA may not be challenged on appeal (see, People v Lyday, 241 AD2d 950; see also, People v Freeman, 236 AD2d 897; People v Stevens, 235 AD2d 440, lv granted 90 NY2d 864). The proper procedure for challenging a classification determination under SORA is a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. No such proceeding [977] has been commenced in this case. Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Hayes, Doerr and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cash, 242 A.D.2d 976, 664 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10650 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

242 A.D.2d 976 (People v. Cash) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hahlbohm
17 Misc. 3d 979 (New York County Courts, 2007)
Sims v. Sperrazza
20 A.D.3d 944 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Wroten
286 A.D.2d 189 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
People v. Kearns
253 A.D.2d 768 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Raphael S. v. Leventhal
246 A.D.2d 659 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)