People v. Kearns
This text of 253 A.D.2d 559 (People v. Kearns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demarest, J.), imposed February 7, 1997, on the ground that it is excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The People concede the defendant’s contention that his waiver of the right to appeal was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent (see, People v Rose, 236 AD2d 637; People v Rolon, 220 AD2d 543).
The defendant’s contention that the sentence was excessive is without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Copertino, Sullivan and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
253 A.D.2d 559, 676 N.Y.S.2d 517, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kearns-nyappdiv-1998.