People v. Kearns

253 A.D.2d 559, 676 N.Y.S.2d 517, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9203
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 31, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 253 A.D.2d 559 (People v. Kearns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Kearns, 253 A.D.2d 559, 676 N.Y.S.2d 517, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9203 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demarest, J.), imposed February 7, 1997, on the ground that it is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The People concede the defendant’s contention that his waiver of the right to appeal was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent (see, People v Rose, 236 AD2d 637; People v Rolon, 220 AD2d 543).

The defendant’s contention that the sentence was excessive is without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Copertino, Sullivan and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Holland
109 A.D.3d 1004 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
253 A.D.2d 559, 676 N.Y.S.2d 517, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kearns-nyappdiv-1998.