People v. Carney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Carney

276 A.D.2d 920, 716 N.Y.S.2d 611

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 26, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 276 A.D.2d 920 (People v. Carney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Carney, 276 A.D.2d 920, 716 N.Y.S.2d 611 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Otsego County (Coccoma, J.), rendered April 12, 1999, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of driving while intoxicated.

Defense counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment as counsel for defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Upon our review of the record, we agree. The record reveals that after an extensive and thorough plea colloquy and while represented by counsel, defendant entered a knowing, voluntary and intelligent plea of guilty to the crime of driving while intoxicated, a class D felony (see, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [3]; § 1193 [1] [c] [ii]). Defendant also waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence (see, People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 11) He was sentenced in accordance with the negotiated plea agreement to a prison term of 1 to 3 years. In view of the foregoing, the judgment is affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Spain, J. P., Carpinello, Graffeo, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Otsego County (Coccoma, J.), rendered April 12, 1999, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of driving while intoxicated.

Defense counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment as counsel for defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Upon our review of the record, we agree. The record reveals that after an extensive and thorough plea colloquy and while represented by counsel, defendant entered a knowing, voluntary and intelligent plea of guilty to the crime of driving while intoxicated, a class D felony (see, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [3]; § 1193 [1] [c] [ii]). Defendant also waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence (see, People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 11) He was sentenced in accordance with the negotiated plea agreement to a prison term of 1 to 3 years. In view of the foregoing, the judgment is affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Spain, J. P., Carpinello, Graffeo, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

276 A.D.2d 920, 716 N.Y.S.2d 611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-carney-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack