People v. Candelario

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Candelario

192 A.D.2d 1138, 598 N.Y.S.2d 750, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4241

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 14, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 192 A.D.2d 1138 (People v. Candelario) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Candelario, 192 A.D.2d 1138, 598 N.Y.S.2d 750, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4241 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Motion to extend time to take appeal granted. Memorandum: Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1022.11 (a), counsel is required to notify defendant in writing of defendant’s right to appeal in all cases (see, People v Kieffer, 191 AD2d 1050). No exception is made for defendants who waive their right to appeal (see also, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273). Present— Callahan, J. P., Balio, Lawton, Boomer and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Motion to extend time to take appeal granted. Memorandum: Pursuant to 22 NYCRR 1022.11 (a), counsel is required to notify defendant in writing of defendant’s right to appeal in all cases (see, People v Kieffer, 191 AD2d 1050). No exception is made for defendants who waive their right to appeal (see also, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273). Present— Callahan, J. P., Balio, Lawton, Boomer and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 A.D.2d 1138, 598 N.Y.S.2d 750, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-candelario-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack