People v. Campbell

237 A.D.2d 455, 655 N.Y.S.2d 973, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2506
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Campbell. Read the opinion of the Court — 204 A.D.2d 474

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Aiello, J.), rendered November 13, 1995, convicting him of reckless endangerment in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (three counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

. Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the court’s charge, as a whole, properly conveyed to the jury the correct standard to be applied concerning the charges on criminal possession of a weapon and made clear to the jurors what weapons were relevant to those charges (see, People v Adams, 69 NY2d 805; People v Canty, 60 NY2d 830).. Moreover, the defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review, without merit, or do not require reversal. Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Pizzuto and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Campbell, 237 A.D.2d 455, 655 N.Y.S.2d 973, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2506 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

237 A.D.2d 455 (People v. Campbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Adams
505 N.E.2d 946 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Canty
457 N.E.2d 800 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)