People v. Campbell

203 A.D.2d 127, 610 N.Y.S.2d 246, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4042
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 19, 1994·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Rothwax, J.), rendered June 12, 1991, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a violent second felony offender, to a term of from 6V2 to 13 years, unanimously affirmed.

While the jury first deliberated for only three hours before the trial court at defendant’s first trial declared a mistrial, there is no minimum time a jury must deliberate before a mistrial is considered (People v Baptiste, 72 NY2d 356, 361). Following the procedure set forth in Matter of Plummer v Rothwax (63 NY2d 243, 252), the trial court inquired of each juror whether further deliberations would be fruitless. Since the sole issue was identification, and since each juror unequivocally stated that the jury was hopelessly deadlocked, it cannot be said that declaring a mistrial was an abuse of discretion (CPL 310.60).

In addition no objection was made until after the court declared the mistrial. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Wallach, Ross and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Campbell, 203 A.D.2d 127, 610 N.Y.S.2d 246, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4042 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

203 A.D.2d 127 (People v. Campbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hill
17 A.D.3d 1081 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Smith
12 A.D.3d 219 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
People v. Reed
230 A.D.2d 866 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Campbell v. Brunnelle
925 F. Supp. 150 (S.D. New York, 1996)