People v. Campbell

236 A.D.2d 618, 654 N.Y.S.2d 667, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1510
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 24, 1997·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Spires, J.), rendered June 19, 1995, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

Most of the defendant’s claims of prosecutorial misconduct are unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Medina, 53 NY2d 951, 953; People v Pope, 177 AD2d 658; CPL 470.05 [2]; see also, People v Fleming, 70 NY2d 947, 948). In any event, no reversible error took place either during cross-examination of defense witnesses or upon the prosecutor’s summation. The summation did not exceed the bounds of permissible rhetorical comment (see, People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396). O’Brien, J. P., Thompson, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Campbell, 236 A.D.2d 618, 654 N.Y.S.2d 667, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1510 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

236 A.D.2d 618 (People v. Campbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rivers
266 A.D.2d 481 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)