People v. Campbell

225 A.D.2d 1021, 639 N.Y.2d 225, 639 N.Y.S.2d 225, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2835
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 8, 1996·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Memorandum: Following a vehicle chase through the City of Rochester, defendant exited his vehicle and, while attempting to flee on foot, was apprehended by a Rochester police officer. Another officer, who had pursued defendant during the vehicle chase but who had momentarily lost sight of defendant before defendant’s apprehension, then identified defendant to the apprehending officer as the driver of the vehicle. County Court properly determined that the identification was confirmatory and that no CPL 710.30 notice was required (see, People v Starr, 221 AD2d 488; People v Dueno, 203 AD2d 476, 477; People v Jackson, 167 AD2d 420, 420-421, lv denied 77 NY2d 962). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Marks, J. — Criminal Possession of Stolen Property, 3rd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Lawton, Wesley, Doerr and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Campbell, 225 A.D.2d 1021, 639 N.Y.2d 225, 639 N.Y.S.2d 225, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2835 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

225 A.D.2d 1021 (People v. Campbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Boyer
846 N.E.2d 461 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)