People v. Callens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Callens

199 A.D.2d 992, 608 N.Y.S.2d 921, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12591

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 29, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 199 A.D.2d 992 (People v. Callens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Callens, 199 A.D.2d 992, 608 N.Y.S.2d 921, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12591 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We conclude that defendant’s plea of guilty was entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently. Because defendant’s plea included the waiver of his right to appeal, defendant has waived any right to have this Court consider the excessiveness of his sentence (see, People v [993]*993Allen, 82 NY2d 761). (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, D’Amico, J.—Sodomy, 1st Degree.) Present—Pine, J. P., Balio, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We conclude that defendant’s plea of guilty was entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently. Because defendant’s plea included the waiver of his right to appeal, defendant has waived any right to have this Court consider the excessiveness of his sentence (see, People v [993]*993Allen, 82 NY2d 761). (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, D’Amico, J.—Sodomy, 1st Degree.) Present—Pine, J. P., Balio, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 A.D.2d 992, 608 N.Y.S.2d 921, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12591, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-callens-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack