People v. Lee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Lee

236 A.D.2d 213, 654 N.Y.S.2d 116, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 807

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 4, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 236 A.D.2d 213 (People v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Lee, 236 A.D.2d 213, 654 N.Y.S.2d 116, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 807 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Sheridan, J., at hearing and plea; Juanita Bing Newton, J., at sentence), rendered June 30, 1994, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him to a prison term of one year, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal the suppression ruling was not negated by the court’s imposition of a sentence greater than that bargained for, where defendant clearly violated a condition, to which he assented, of his voluntary, intelligent and knowing plea (see, People v Green, 227 AD2d 240, lv denied 88 NY2d 985). There being no viable issues to consider on appeal, we affirm. (People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 284.) Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Rubin, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Sheridan, J., at hearing and plea; Juanita Bing Newton, J., at sentence), rendered June 30, 1994, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him to a prison term of one year, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal the suppression ruling was not negated by the court’s imposition of a sentence greater than that bargained for, where defendant clearly violated a condition, to which he assented, of his voluntary, intelligent and knowing plea (see, People v Green, 227 AD2d 240, lv denied 88 NY2d 985). There being no viable issues to consider on appeal, we affirm. (People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 284.) Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Rubin, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

236 A.D.2d 213, 654 N.Y.S.2d 116, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lee-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack