People v. Cahill
266 A.D.2d 912, 698 N.Y.S.2d 183, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11804
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 12, 1999·Published
Opinion
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The sole contention of defendant is that the sentence is unduly harsh and severe. We perceive no basis to disturb the sentence, which was imposed by County Court as part of a negotiated plea (see, People v Delgado, 80 NY2d 780, 783; People v Roy, 245 AD2d 878; People v Skinner, 224 AD2d 916). (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Henry, Jr., J. — Assault, 2nd Degree.) Present— Denman, P. J., Pine, Hayes, Wisner and Balio, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Cahill, 266 A.D.2d 912, 698 N.Y.S.2d 183, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11804 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).
266 A.D.2d 912 (People v. Cahill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Delgado
80 N.Y.2d 780 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Skinner
224 A.D.2d 916 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
People v. Roy
245 A.D.2d 878 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)