People v. Burnett

152 A.D.2d 910, 544 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9743
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 12, 1989·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Although defendant established a prima facie case of "purposeful discrimination”, the prose[911]*911cutor proffered reasonably specific race-neutral reasons for his use of peremptory challenges to exclude three black members of the jury panel (Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79; People v Scott, 70 NY2d 420). We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be lacking in merit. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Mark, J.— robbery, first degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Burnett, 152 A.D.2d 910, 544 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9743 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

152 A.D.2d 910 (People v. Burnett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Velasquez
202 A.D.2d 1037 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
People v. Duncan
177 A.D.2d 187 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Jones
156 A.D.2d 954 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Davis
156 A.D.2d 969 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)