People v. Burks

219 A.D.2d 854, 632 N.Y.S.2d 354, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10961
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 29, 1995
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 219 A.D.2d 854 (People v. Burks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Burks, 219 A.D.2d 854, 632 N.Y.S.2d 354, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10961 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention that defendant’s absence from a Sandoval and Ventimiglia conference warrants reversal. Subsequent proceedings held in open court in defendant’s presence constituted a de novo Sandoval and Ventimiglia hearing (see, People v Vargas, 201 AD2d 963, lv denied 83 NY2d 859; People v Russell, 191 AD2d 1001, lv denied 81 NY2d 1019; People v Berger, 188 AD2d 1073, 1074, lv denied 81 NY2d 881). (Resubmission of Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J. — Scheme to Defraud, 1st Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Lawton, Fallon, Doerr and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Alcantara
226 A.D.2d 648 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
219 A.D.2d 854, 632 N.Y.S.2d 354, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10961, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-burks-nyappdiv-1995.