People v. Burks

210 A.D.2d 887, 621 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13338
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Burks. Read the opinion of the Court — 221 A.D.2d 201

Opinion

—Case held, decision reserved and matter remitted to Onondaga County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: The record does not indicate whether defendant was present at the Sandoval conference or at the Ventimiglia hearing. Thus, we remit the matter to County Court for a reconstruction hearing to expand the record and to determine whether defendant was present (see, People v Odiat, 82 NY2d 872; People v Mitchell, 189 AD2d 337). (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J.—Scheme to Defraud, 1st Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Fallon, Doerr and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Burks, 210 A.D.2d 887, 621 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13338 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

210 A.D.2d 887 (People v. Burks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Odiat
631 N.E.2d 108 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
People v. Mitchell
189 A.D.2d 337 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)