Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Burgos

People v. Burgos

294 A.D.2d 444, 741 N.Y.S.2d 901, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4913
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Burgos. Read the opinion of the Court — 291 A.D.2d 904 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 13, 2002·Published

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kangs County (Demarest, J.), rendered June 26, 2000, convicting him of murder in the second degree and attempted assault in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court’s Sandoval ruling was a provident exercise of discretion (see People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371; People v Bennette, 56 NY2d 142; People v Thompson, 202 AD2d 454).

The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review. Ritter, J.P., Goldstein, Luciano and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Burgos, 294 A.D.2d 444, 741 N.Y.S.2d 901, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

294 A.D.2d 444 (People v. Burgos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Sandoval
314 N.E.2d 413 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)
People v. Bennette
436 N.E.2d 1249 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
People v. Thompson
202 A.D.2d 454 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)