People v. Burgos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Burgos

268 A.D.2d 440, 701 N.Y.S.2d 619, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 221

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 10, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 268 A.D.2d 440 (People v. Burgos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Burgos, 268 A.D.2d 440, 701 N.Y.S.2d 619, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 221 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the de-: fendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), rendered June 16, 1997, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

The defendant has raised no nonfrivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Joy, Altman and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the de-: fendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), rendered June 16, 1997, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

The defendant has raised no nonfrivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Joy, Altman and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

268 A.D.2d 440, 701 N.Y.S.2d 619, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-burgos-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack