People v. Burgess

195 A.D.2d 1081, 601 N.Y.S.2d 899
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 16, 1993·No. Appeal No. 1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The record reflects that, as part of his plea bargain, defendant made a voluntary, knowing and intelligent waiver of his right [1082]*1082to appeal (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Moissett, 76 NY2d 909; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). Defendant has raised no categories of appellate claims that survive his waiver (see, People v Callahan, supra, at 280; People v Bonner, 193 AD2d 1140; People v Akel, 192 AD2d 1135; People v Saunders, 190 AD2d 1092). In any event, were we to consider the merits of defendant’s claim, we would find it to be lacking in merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Rossetti, J.—Robbery, 2nd Degree.) Present— Denman, P. J., Callahan, Boomer, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Burgess, 195 A.D.2d 1081, 601 N.Y.S.2d 899 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

195 A.D.2d 1081 (People v. Burgess) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Burgess
195 A.D.2d 1082 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)