People v. Burdock

3 Cai. Cas. 104
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1805·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

AN indictment found against the defendants for a forcible entry and detainer, in April term, 1798, had, on being removed into this court, been quashed, and restitution ordered, but the record of it could not, on search in the clerk’s office, be found.

Riker applied for leave to file a record nunc pro tunc, on an affidavit by the attorney employed in the prosecution, disclosing the above facts, and that, on an examination, of his register, he found not only that a record had been duly filed, but that he actually obtained an exemplification of it, which had been lost.

Granted Accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Burdock, 3 Cai. Cas. 104 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1805).

3 Cai. Cas. 104 (People v. Burdock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baker v. Wales
14 Abb. Pr. 331 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1873)
Bowman v. McLaughlin
45 Miss. 461 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1871)