People v. Burdock

New York Supreme Court

People v. Burdock

3 Cai. Cas. 104

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedMay 15, 1805

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 3 Cai. Cas. 104 (People v. Burdock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Burdock, 3 Cai. Cas. 104 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1805).

Pincite

Opinion

AN indictment found against the defendants for a forcible entry and detainer, in April term, 1798, had, on being removed into this court, been quashed, and restitution ordered, but the record of it could not, on search in the clerk’s office, be found.

Riker applied for leave to file a record nunc pro tunc, on an affidavit by the attorney employed in the prosecution, disclosing the above facts, and that, on an examination, of his register, he found not only that a record had been duly filed, but that he actually obtained an exemplification of it, which had been lost.

Granted Accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AN indictment found against the defendants for a forcible entry and detainer, in April term, 1798, had, on being removed into this court, been quashed, and restitution ordered, but the record of it could not, on search in the clerk’s office, be found.

Riker applied for leave to file a record nunc pro tunc, on an affidavit by the attorney employed in the prosecution, disclosing the above facts, and that, on an examination, of his register, he found not only that a record had been duly filed, but that he actually obtained an exemplification of it, which had been lost.

Granted Accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Cai. Cas. 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-burdock-nysupct-1805.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack