People v. Bullock

267 A.D.2d 175, 700 N.Y.S.2d 675, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13375
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Bullock. Read the opinion of the Court — 287 A.D.2d 465

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered February 21, 1995, convicting defendant, upon his pleas of guilty, of three counts of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to three concurrent terms of 7 to 14 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s ineffective assistance claim is based on factual assertions dehors the record and thus would require a motion pursuant to CPL 440.10. To the extent defendant’s claim can [176]*176be reviewed on the instant record, we find that defendant received meaningful representation (see, People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404).

We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur — Tom, J. P., Wallach, Lerner, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bullock, 267 A.D.2d 175, 700 N.Y.S.2d 675, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13375 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

267 A.D.2d 175 (People v. Bullock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ford
657 N.E.2d 265 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)