People v. Buchanan

2019 NY Slip Op 2891
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 17, 2019
DocketInd. No. 2849/15
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 2891 (People v. Buchanan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Buchanan, 2019 NY Slip Op 2891 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

People v Buchanan (2019 NY Slip Op 02891)
People v Buchanan
2019 NY Slip Op 02891
Decided on April 17, 2019
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on April 17, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
HECTOR D. LASALLE
BETSY BARROS
LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

2017-06004
(Ind. No. 2849/15)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Sheldon K. Buchanan, appellant.


Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Hannah Zhao of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, Ellen C. Abbot, and Eugene J. Dirks of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (James P. Griffin, J., at plea; Barry Kron, J., at sentencing), rendered January 30, 2017, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the record demonstrates that he knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337, 339-342; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257; cf. People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133, 145-146).

The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal forecloses appellate review of his challenge to the hearing court's suppression determination (see People v Patterson, 106 AD3d 757; People v Kidd, 100 AD3d 779; People v Holland, 44 AD3d 874; People v Brathwaite, 263 AD2d 89, 91).

DILLON, J.P., LASALLE, BARROS and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Brown
122 A.D.3d 133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
The People v. Rasaun Sanders
34 N.E.3d 344 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
People v. Holland
44 A.D.3d 874 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Kidd
100 A.D.3d 779 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Patterson
106 A.D.3d 757 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Brathwaite
263 A.D.2d 89 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 2891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-buchanan-nyappdiv-2019.