People v. Buchanan

2018 NY Slip Op 1135
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 15, 2018
Docket5726 861/11
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 1135 (People v. Buchanan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Buchanan, 2018 NY Slip Op 1135 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

People v Buchanan (2018 NY Slip Op 01135)
People v Buchanan
2018 NY Slip Op 01135
Decided on February 15, 2018
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 15, 2018
Friedman, J.P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Singh, JJ.

5726 861/11

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Dwayne Buchanan, Defendant-Appellant.


Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Desiree Sheridan of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Amanda Katherine Regan of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald A. Zweibel, J.), entered on or about May 12, 2015, which adjudicated defendant a level three sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The Court properly assessed 20 and 10 points, respectively, under the risk factors for the victim's helplessness and for forcible compulsion, because the victim's reliable account demonstrated both physical helplessness and forcible compulsion at different times during the incident (see People v Alvarez-Perez, 155 AD3d 430 [1st Dept 2017]).

The court providently exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]). The mitigating factors cited by defendant were

adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument or outweighed by aggravating factors, including the seriousness of the underlying offense.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: FEBRUARY 15, 2018

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Alvarez-Perez
2017 NY Slip Op 7771 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Gillotti
18 N.E.3d 701 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 1135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-buchanan-nyappdiv-2018.