People v. Bryant
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jones, J.), rendered November 6, 1996, convicting him of rob[859]*859bery in the first degree (two counts), robbery in the second degree (two counts), and assault in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his identity as the perpetrator is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). Rosenblatt, J. P., Copertino, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
250 A.D.2d 858 (People v. Bryant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.