People v. Brown

154 A.D.2d 610, 546 N.Y.S.2d 438, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13504
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Brown. Read the opinion of the Court — 124 A.D.2d 667

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Miller, J.), imposed September 19,1986.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Our review of the sentencing proceeding reveals that, con[611]*611trary to the defendant’s contention, the court did not increase the sentence because the defendant declined to cooperate with law enforcement authorities on an unrelated matter (cf., People v Patterson, 106 AD2d 520). Rather, the defendant chose to forego an opportunity to receive a more lenient sentence, and the court properly proceeded with the sentencing. The term of incarceration imposed was not unduly harsh or excessive, and we decline to reduce it (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mollen, P. J., Lawrence, Hooper, Spatt and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Brown, 154 A.D.2d 610, 546 N.Y.S.2d 438, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13504 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

154 A.D.2d 610 (People v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Patterson
106 A.D.2d 520 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)