People v. Brown

124 A.D.2d 592, 507 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 61903
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 3, 1986·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

In addition to the passing by the defendant of what appeared to be two white envelopes, this case involves the observation by an experienced police officer of three suspicious transactions in a location known for drug trafficking in which there was an exchange of currency (see, People v McRay, 51 NY2d 594; People v Luccioni, 120 AD2d 617; People v Balas, 104 AD2d 1039; People v Bittner, 97 AD2d 33). We are satisfied that under the totality of the circumstances, there was sufficient information to lead a reasonable person who possessed the same expertise as the officer to conclude that a crime was being committed and, therefore, that probable cause to arrest existed. Thompson, J. P., Weinstein, Rubin and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Brown, 124 A.D.2d 592, 507 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 61903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

124 A.D.2d 592 (People v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Vega
56 A.D.2d 578 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Schlaich
218 A.D.2d 398 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
People v. Jones
186 A.D.2d 681 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Wilson
175 A.D.2d 15 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
People v. Arimont
161 A.D.2d 769 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Mills
145 A.D.2d 578 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
People v. Zarzuela
141 A.D.2d 788 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)