People v. Broschart

301 A.D.2d 658, 753 N.Y.S.2d 878
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 27, 2003·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Orange County (Rosenwasser, J.), both rendered May 29, 2001, convicting him of burglary in the first degree under Indictment No. 00-00156, and burglary in the first degree under Indictment No. 00-00567, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

A review of the record of the plea proceeding “reflects a knowing, intelligent and voluntary choice” of the defendant to waive his right to appeal (People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 736). This waiver encompassed the right to appeal his sentence as excessive (see People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 9).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Prudenti, P.J., Ritter, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Broschart, 301 A.D.2d 658, 753 N.Y.S.2d 878 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

301 A.D.2d 658 (People v. Broschart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Brunjes
14 A.D.3d 619 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Broschart
2 A.D.3d 873 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)