People v. Brooks

154 A.D.2d 931, 545 N.Y.S.2d 876, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13001
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 6, 1989·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant’s claim that the sentencing court erred in failing to honor its sentence agreement. Where, as here, the court expressly makes its commitment to impose a particular sentence subject to certain conditions and defendant violates one of the conditions, the court is no longer bound to the agreement and may impose a greater sentence without offering defendant an opportunity to withdraw his plea (see, People v Murello, 39 NY2d 879; People v Dodson, 114 AD2d 421, 422; People v McDaniels, 111 AD2d 876, 877). In any event, defendant never moved to withdraw his guilty plea and thus has failed to preserve this issue for appellate review (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662). Defendant’s remaining claims are likewise without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Marks, J. — attempted burglary, second degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Boomer, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Brooks, 154 A.D.2d 931, 545 N.Y.S.2d 876, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13001 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

154 A.D.2d 931 (People v. Brooks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Parsons
210 A.D.2d 901 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
People v. Kessner
181 A.D.2d 1044 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Shannon
175 A.D.2d 614 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
People v. Thompson
174 A.D.2d 1007 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
People v. Howington
168 A.D.2d 1006 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)