People v. Britton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Britton

208 A.D.2d 761, 619 N.Y.S.2d 571

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 17, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 208 A.D.2d 761 (People v. Britton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Britton, 208 A.D.2d 761, 619 N.Y.S.2d 571 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rienzi, J.), rendered July 8, 1991, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of the branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The record reveals that prior to the hearing court’s rendering its decision on the branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence, the defendant elected to plead guilty. Accordingly, the defendant forfeited his right to appellate review of the suppression issue (see, People v Patterson, 194 AD2d 748; People v Carty, 173 AD2d 900; see generally, People v Fernandez, 67 NY2d 686). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rienzi, J.), rendered July 8, 1991, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of the branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The record reveals that prior to the hearing court’s rendering its decision on the branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence, the defendant elected to plead guilty. Accordingly, the defendant forfeited his right to appellate review of the suppression issue (see, People v Patterson, 194 AD2d 748; People v Carty, 173 AD2d 900; see generally, People v Fernandez, 67 NY2d 686). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

208 A.D.2d 761, 619 N.Y.S.2d 571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-britton-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack