People v. Britton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Britton

208 A.D.2d 761, 619 N.Y.S.2d 280

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 17, 1994·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Meyer, J.), rendered December 19, 1991, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Prior to his commission of the present felony offense, the defendant had been previously convicted of the felony of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (see, People v Britton, 208 AD2d 761 [decided herewith]). Accordingly, we find no merit to the defendant’s contention on appeal that he was improperly sentenced as a second felony offender (Penal Law § 60.05). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Meyer, J.), rendered December 19, 1991, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Prior to his commission of the present felony offense, the defendant had been previously convicted of the felony of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (see, People v Britton, 208 AD2d 761 [decided herewith]). Accordingly, we find no merit to the defendant’s contention on appeal that he was improperly sentenced as a second felony offender (Penal Law § 60.05). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

People v. Britton, 208 A.D.2d 761, 619 N.Y.S.2d 280 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

208 A.D.2d 761 (People v. Britton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related