People v. Brandon
49 A.D.3d 660, 852 N.Y.2d 796
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Brandon. Read the opinion of the Court — 35 A.D.3d 876 →
Opinion
The defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which was thereafter actually imposed. Therefore, he has no basis now to complain that the sentence was excessive (see People v Ramirez, 46 AD3d 844 [2007]; People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816, 817 [1984]).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, are without merit. Rivera, J.P., Miller, Dillon and Belen, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Brandon, 49 A.D.3d 660, 852 N.Y.2d 796 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).
49 A.D.3d 660 (People v. Brandon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Ramirez
46 A.D.3d 844 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Kazepis
101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)