People v. Brandon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Brandon

49 A.D.3d 660, 852 N.Y.2d 796

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 11, 2008

StatusPublished

This text of 49 A.D.3d 660 (People v. Brandon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Brandon, 49 A.D.3d 660, 852 N.Y.2d 796 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which was thereafter actually imposed. Therefore, he has no basis now to complain that the sentence was excessive (see People v Ramirez, 46 AD3d 844 [2007]; People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816, 817 [1984]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, are without merit. Rivera, J.P., Miller, Dillon and Belen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which was thereafter actually imposed. Therefore, he has no basis now to complain that the sentence was excessive (see People v Ramirez, 46 AD3d 844 [2007]; People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816, 817 [1984]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, are without merit. Rivera, J.P., Miller, Dillon and Belen, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.3d 660, 852 N.Y.2d 796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-brandon-nyappdiv-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack