People v. Brady

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Brady

21 A.D.2d 979, 247 N.Y.S.2d 805, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4217

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 17, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 21 A.D.2d 979 (People v. Brady) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Brady, 21 A.D.2d 979, 247 N.Y.S.2d 805, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4217 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion granted to the extent of directing the Clerk of the Supreme Court, New York County, to furnish to appellant’s counsel a copy of the transcript of the hearing on the motion to suppress. The court construes section 456 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to require the Clerk of the court and the stenographer to cause the stenographic minutes of the hearing on the motion to suppress to be transcribed and filed as part of “ the stenographic minutes of the entire proceedings of the trial” even where the motion to suppress is heard and decided prior to the trial on the indictment since the appeal from the judgment of conviction after trial brings up for review the order denying a motion to suppress. The time to perfect the appeal is enlarged to the June 1964 Term of this court. (See, also, People v. Cook, 21 A D 2d 979.) Concur — Breitel, J. P., Yalente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion granted to the extent of directing the Clerk of the Supreme Court, New York County, to furnish to appellant’s counsel a copy of the transcript of the hearing on the motion to suppress. The court construes section 456 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to require the Clerk of the court and the stenographer to cause the stenographic minutes of the hearing on the motion to suppress to be transcribed and filed as part of “ the stenographic minutes of the entire proceedings of the trial” even where the motion to suppress is heard and decided prior to the trial on the indictment since the appeal from the judgment of conviction after trial brings up for review the order denying a motion to suppress. The time to perfect the appeal is enlarged to the June 1964 Term of this court. (See, also, People v. Cook, 21 A D 2d 979.) Concur — Breitel, J. P., Yalente, McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 A.D.2d 979, 247 N.Y.S.2d 805, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-brady-nyappdiv-1964.