People v. Brady

14 A.D.2d 575, 218 N.Y.S.2d 705, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9552
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 11, 1961·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In our opinion, it was prejudicial error to allow the jury to consider a plea of guilty which had been withdrawn by permission of the court, and to permit the prosecutor on the People’s case in chief to use such plea as proof of the defendant’s guilt (People v. Spitaleri, 9 N Y 2d 168). The prosecutor’s repeated references to such prior plea of guilt in his opening and in his summation, and the learned Trial Judge’s reference to it in his charge to the jury, even though defense counsel raised no objection or exception to such reference by the Trial Judge, served to deprive defendant of a fair trial (People v. Rehm, 13 A D 2d 844). Appeal from orders, dated December 14,1960 and January 16, 1961, dismissed as academic. Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur; Nolan, P. J., concurs in the dismissal of the appeal from the orders, but dissents from the reversal of the judgment and the granting of a new trial, and votes to affirm the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Brady, 14 A.D.2d 575, 218 N.Y.S.2d 705, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9552 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

14 A.D.2d 575 (People v. Brady) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Heffron
59 A.D.2d 263 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
State v. Wright
436 P.2d 601 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1968)
State v. Wright
427 P.2d 338 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1967)