People v. Bradshaw

216 A.D.2d 572, 628 N.Y.S.2d 572, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7013
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Bradshaw. Read the opinion of the Court — 223 A.D.2d 651

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Ain, J.), rendered March 20, 1992, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Initially it is noted that the defendant’s claim that the trial court’s jury charge on identification was prejudicial was not preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245). In any event, this contention is without merit. The County Court’s instruction clearly conveyed that it was the jury’s responsibility to assure that the defendant’s identification was proven beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Whalen, 59 NY2d 273). Thompson, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bradshaw, 216 A.D.2d 572, 628 N.Y.S.2d 572, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7013 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

216 A.D.2d 572 (People v. Bradshaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Whalen
451 N.E.2d 212 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Udzinski
146 A.D.2d 245 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)