People v. Bradley

195 A.D.2d 995, 602 N.Y.S.2d 570, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7790
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 16, 1993·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The finding of the suppression court that defendant voluntarily and knowingly waived his right against self-incrimination was supported by the testi[996]*996mony at the hearing. Defendant had extensive experience with the criminal justice system and his inquiry about what would happen if he talked to the police did not indicate that he misunderstood the rights that were read to him. The record fails to demonstrate that defendant suffered any prejudice as a result of the court’s charge on the function of an indictment or the court’s marshalling of the evidence. Contrary to defendant’s contention, his sentence is not harsh and excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, DiFlorio, J. —Robbery, 1st Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Lawton, Boomer and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bradley, 195 A.D.2d 995, 602 N.Y.S.2d 570, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7790 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

195 A.D.2d 995 (People v. Bradley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. East
174 Misc. 2d 374 (New York County Courts, 1997)