People v. Bradley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bradley

182 A.D.2d 581, 582 N.Y.S.2d 203, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6357

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 28, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 182 A.D.2d 581 (People v. Bradley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bradley, 182 A.D.2d 581, 582 N.Y.S.2d 203, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6357 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Allen G. Alpert, J., at plea; Frederic S. Berman, J., at sentence), rendered July 26, 1990, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted burglary in the second degree, and sentencing him as a persistent violent felony offender, to a prison term of 7 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Upon review of the record, we find that defendant’s plea was knowing and voluntary (People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9), and that defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel was not abridged by the court’s refusal to adjourn the sentencing, an associate of defendant’s attorney having been present at the sentencing to make sure that he received the promised sentence (compare, People v Spears, 64 NY2d 698). Concur— Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Allen G. Alpert, J., at plea; Frederic S. Berman, J., at sentence), rendered July 26, 1990, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted burglary in the second degree, and sentencing him as a persistent violent felony offender, to a prison term of 7 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Upon review of the record, we find that defendant’s plea was knowing and voluntary (People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9), and that defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel was not abridged by the court’s refusal to adjourn the sentencing, an associate of defendant’s attorney having been present at the sentencing to make sure that he received the promised sentence (compare, People v Spears, 64 NY2d 698). Concur— Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Asch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

182 A.D.2d 581, 582 N.Y.S.2d 203, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bradley-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack