People v. Bowman

212 A.D.2d 997, 622 N.Y.S.2d 175, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1864
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Bowman. Read the opinion of the Court — 185 A.D.2d 891

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, inter alia, of burglary in the second degree. We conclude that defendant was not denied effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 146-147). Defendant failed to demonstrate that there was no legitimate explanation for counsel’s strategy to concede defendant’s possession of stolen property while contesting defendant’s involvement in the burglary (see, People v Ellis, 81 NY2d 854, 856-857; People v Garcia, 75 NY2d 973, 974). We have reviewed defendant’s remaining arguments and conclude that they are lacking in merit. (Appeal from Judgment of [998]*998Oneida County Court, Merrell, J.—Burglary, 2nd Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bowman, 212 A.D.2d 997, 622 N.Y.S.2d 175, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1864 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

212 A.D.2d 997 (People v. Bowman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Baldi
429 N.E.2d 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Garcia
555 N.E.2d 902 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)
People v. Ellis
613 N.E.2d 529 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)