People v. Bowman

192 A.D.2d 1055, 598 N.Y.S.2d 748, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4058
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Bowman. Read the opinion of the Court — 185 A.D.2d 891

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), was sufficient to establish that defendant engaged in deviate sexual intercourse with the victim (see, [1056]*1056Penal Law § 130.00 [2]; § 130.50 [3]), and the jury’s verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Gorman, J. — Sodomy, 1st Degree.) Present. —Denman, P. J., Green, Balio, Fallon and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bowman, 192 A.D.2d 1055, 598 N.Y.S.2d 748, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4058 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

192 A.D.2d 1055 (People v. Bowman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)