People v. Bove

255 A.D.2d 330, 679 N.Y.S.2d 330, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11549

This text of 255 A.D.2d 330 (People v. Bove) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Bove, 255 A.D.2d 330, 679 N.Y.S.2d 330, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11549 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Greenberg, J.), rendered March 13, 1997, convicting him of [331]*331robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Mangano, P. J., Miller, Thompson and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Gray
652 N.E.2d 919 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Udzinski
146 A.D.2d 245 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
255 A.D.2d 330, 679 N.Y.S.2d 330, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bove-nyappdiv-1998.