People v. Boubacar

2023 NY Slip Op 06218
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 5, 2023
DocketSCI No. 3294/16 Appeal No. 1140 Case No. 2020-01274
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2023 NY Slip Op 06218 (People v. Boubacar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Boubacar, 2023 NY Slip Op 06218 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

People v Boubacar (2023 NY Slip Op 06218)
People v Boubacar
2023 NY Slip Op 06218
Decided on December 05, 2023
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: December 05, 2023
Before: Kern, J.P., Gesmer, Moulton, Kennedy, Higgitt, JJ.

SCI No. 3294/16 Appeal No. 1140 Case No. 2020-01274

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Barry Boubacar, Defendant-Appellant.


Twyla Carter, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Robin Richardson of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Reva Grace Phillips of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Raymond L. Bruce, J.), entered on or about January 10, 2020, which adjudicated defendant a level two sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court providently exercised its discretion in declining a downward departure (see generally People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841, 861 [2014]). Defendant's completion of sex offender and drug and alcohol treatment programs, and the fact that he had not committed any prior violent or sex offense, were adequately accounted for by the risk assessment instrument (see People v Williams, 216 AD3d 438, 439 [1st Dept 2023], lv denied 40 NY3d 904 [2023]). Defendant's argument that the SORA guidelines were based on outdated studies is unpreserved, and we decline to address it in the interest of justice. The lengthy period of postrelease supervision imposed on defendant is not a "significant mitigating factor" (People v Lewis, 143 AD3d 604, 605 [1st Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 916 [2017]). In any event, the mitigating factors cited were outweighed by the seriousness of the underlying crime, in which defendant grabbed a female stranger off the street and raped her.THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: December 5, 2023



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Boubacar
2023 NY Slip Op 06218 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2023 NY Slip Op 06218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-boubacar-nyappdiv-2023.