People v. Bostick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bostick

256 A.D.2d 222, 682 N.Y.S.2d 347

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 22, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 256 A.D.2d 222 (People v. Bostick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bostick, 256 A.D.2d 222, 682 N.Y.S.2d 347 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Edwin Torres, J.), rendered May 14, 1997, as to defendant Bryan Bostick, and April 21, 1997, as to defendant Walter Miles, convicting both defendants, upon their pleas of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, and sentencing each of them to a term of 8V3 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Defendants’ motions to withdraw their guilty pleas were properly denied. The record establishes that their pleas were entered knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily (see, People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536; People v Bermudez, 228 AD2d 237, lv denied 89 NY2d 919), belying their conclusory claims of coercion, confusion and innocence. Concur — Tom, J. P., Mazzarelli, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Edwin Torres, J.), rendered May 14, 1997, as to defendant Bryan Bostick, and April 21, 1997, as to defendant Walter Miles, convicting both defendants, upon their pleas of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, and sentencing each of them to a term of 8V3 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Defendants’ motions to withdraw their guilty pleas were properly denied. The record establishes that their pleas were entered knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily (see, People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536; People v Bermudez, 228 AD2d 237, lv denied 89 NY2d 919), belying their conclusory claims of coercion, confusion and innocence. Concur — Tom, J. P., Mazzarelli, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D.2d 222, 682 N.Y.S.2d 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bostick-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack