People v. Bostick
This text of 235 A.D.2d 287 (People v. Bostick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment, Supreme [288]*288Court, New York County (Howard Bell, J.), rendered November 3, 1994, convicting defendant, upon his guilty plea, of attempted burglary in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 1½ to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.
When defendant, represented by new counsel, made an informed decision to plead guilty, he forfeited the right to argue that he was denied the opportunity to testify before the Grand Jury because of his prior attorney’s errors (People v Roberts, 163 AD2d 68, lv denied 76 NY2d 863). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Williams, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
235 A.D.2d 287, 653 N.Y.S.2d 303, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bostick-nyappdiv-1997.