People v. Bobbitt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Bobbitt

213 A.D.2d 417, 624 N.Y.S.2d 879

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 6, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 213 A.D.2d 417 (People v. Bobbitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Bobbitt, 213 A.D.2d 417, 624 N.Y.S.2d 879 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings [418]*418County (Rappaport, J.), rendered March 18, 1994, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he was afforded the opportunity at sentencing to consult with counsel about the factual basis for his motion to withdraw his plea of guilty. There is accordingly no merit to the defendant’s additional contention that he was not afforded "a reasonable opportunity to advance his claims from which an informed and prudent determination [could] be rendered” (People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520, 525). Balletta, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings [418]*418County (Rappaport, J.), rendered March 18, 1994, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he was afforded the opportunity at sentencing to consult with counsel about the factual basis for his motion to withdraw his plea of guilty. There is accordingly no merit to the defendant’s additional contention that he was not afforded "a reasonable opportunity to advance his claims from which an informed and prudent determination [could] be rendered” (People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520, 525). Balletta, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

213 A.D.2d 417, 624 N.Y.S.2d 879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bobbitt-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack