People v. Blackwell

180 A.D.2d 437, 580 N.Y.S.2d 649, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1173
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Blackwell. Read the opinion of the Court — 206 A.D.2d 300

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lawrence J. Tonetti, J.), rendered November 27, 1989, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree, grand larceny in the third degree, and criminal impersonation in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of imprisonment of 4 to 8 years, 2 Vi to 5 years, and 2 to 4 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

For the reasons stated in our decision on the appeal of co-defendant Lazarcheck (People v Lazarcheck, 176 AD2d 691), we reject defendant’s argument that the evidence at trial was insufficient to establish a forcible stealing. Nor was the evidence insufficient to establish the value of the stolen car (see, People v Carter, 19 NY2d 967). The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying counsel’s request for a recess (see, Matter of Anthony M., 63 NY2d 270, 283-284). We have considered defendant’s pro se claims and find them to be without merit. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Ellerin, Kupferman and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Blackwell, 180 A.D.2d 437, 580 N.Y.S.2d 649, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1173 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

180 A.D.2d 437 (People v. Blackwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Carter
228 N.E.2d 415 (New York Court of Appeals, 1967)
People v. Cable
471 N.E.2d 447 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
People v. Lazarcheck
176 A.D.2d 691 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)