People v. Blackwell

175 A.D.2d 673, 573 N.Y.S.2d 936, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10246
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 12, 1991·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The record fully supports the suppression court’s finding that defendant was advised of his Miranda rights (see, Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436), and that he knowingly and intelligently waived his rights and orally admitted his participation in the burglary for which he was arrested. Defendant’s argument that he was denied his right to counsel because he was at that time represented by an attorney on a prior pending charge is without merit. The record is clear that the police questioned him solely on matters unrelated to the prior pending charge (see, People v Bing, 76 NY2d 331). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Connell, J. — Burglary, 2nd Degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Blackwell, 175 A.D.2d 673, 573 N.Y.S.2d 936, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10246 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

175 A.D.2d 673 (People v. Blackwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Watkins
222 A.D.2d 1047 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)