People v. Black

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Black

6 A.D.3d 182, 773 N.Y.S.2d 876, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3719

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 1, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 6 A.D.3d 182 (People v. Black) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Black, 6 A.D.3d 182, 773 N.Y.S.2d 876, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3719 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lawrence Tonetti, J.), rendered May 18, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of sexual abuse in the first degree and endangering the welfare of a child, and sentencing defendant to an aggregate term of five years probation, unanimously affirmed.

[183]*183The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. Issues of credibility, including the resolution of conflicts in testimony, were properly considered by the jury and there is no basis for disturbing its determinations (see People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). The fact that defendant was acquitted of certain counts does not warrant a different conclusion (see People v Rayam, 94 NY2d 557 [2000]).

Defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lawrence Tonetti, J.), rendered May 18, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of sexual abuse in the first degree and endangering the welfare of a child, and sentencing defendant to an aggregate term of five years probation, unanimously affirmed.

[183]*183The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. Issues of credibility, including the resolution of conflicts in testimony, were properly considered by the jury and there is no basis for disturbing its determinations (see People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). The fact that defendant was acquitted of certain counts does not warrant a different conclusion (see People v Rayam, 94 NY2d 557 [2000]).

Defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 A.D.3d 182, 773 N.Y.S.2d 876, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3719, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-black-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack