People v. Black
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.), dated March 31, 2004, which denied his motion pursuant to CPL 440.20 to vacate a judgment of the same court rendered February 3, 1995.
Ordered that the order is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that his sentencing as a persistent felony offender violated his constitutional right to a jury trial pursuant to Apprendi v New Jersey (530 US 466 [2000]), is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, is without merit (see People v Rivera, 5 NY3d 61 [2005], cert denied — US —, 126 S Ct 564 [Oct. 31, 2005]; People v Rosen, 96 NY2d 329 [2001], cert denied 534 US 899 [2001]).
[491]*491The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, without merit. H. Miller, J.P., Cozier, Ritter and Dillon, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
23 A.D.3d 490 (People v. Black) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.