People v. Bissell

49 Cal. 407
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1874
DocketNo. 4,443
StatusPublished
Cited by23 cases

This text of 49 Cal. 407 (People v. Bissell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Bissell, 49 Cal. 407 (Cal. 1874).

Opinions

By the Court, Wallace, C. J.:

Bissel held the office of Inspector of Gas Meters under the Act 1863, and his term of office under that statute, being four years, would have expired on the 29th day of November, 1875. Though the Act of 1863 was repealed, the office he held was, nevertheless, continued by the Political Code. If we assume that he was not continued in office under section 6 of the Political Code, as amended in March, 1874, because the office was one filled by appointment, he is, nevertheless, authorized by section 879 of the same Code to continue to discharge the duties of the office until his successor has qualified. Parkinson is not his successor, because his appointment has not received the consent of the Senate, as required by section 368 of the Political Code. So long as Bissell, therefore, continues to discharge the duties of the office pursuant to the requirements of section 879 of the Code, even though his term of [412]*412office has expired, there is no vacancy in the office, in the, absolute sense, nor in any sense which would authorize the Governor to fill it without the consent of the Senate first had.' Such a vacancy could only be caused by the resignation or death of the incumbent, or some other event by which the duties of the office were no longer discharged at all, in which case, and in order to prevent a failure of the public service, the Governor might appoint during the recess of Senate.

The judgment of the Court below is reversed, and the cause remanded, with directions to render judgment for the defendant pursuant to the specific prayer of the answer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re SD
125 Cal. Rptr. 2d 570 (California Court of Appeal, 2002)
Stanislaus County Community Services Agency v. Anthony D.
102 Cal. App. 4th 560 (California Court of Appeal, 2002)
State Ex Rel. McCarthy v. Watson
45 A.2d 716 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1946)
McCall v. Cull
75 P.2d 696 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1938)
Heyward v. Long
183 S.E. 145 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1935)
State Ex Rel. Saint v. Dowling
120 So. 593 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1928)
People v. Shawyer
222 P. 11 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1924)
State v. Young
68 So. 241 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1915)
People Ex Rel. Mitchell v. . Sohmer
102 N.E. 593 (New York Court of Appeals, 1913)
State Ex Rel. Lyon v. Bowden
75 S.E. 866 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1912)
Shackelford v. West
74 S.E. 1079 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1912)
Draper v. State ex rel. Patillo
57 So. 772 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1911)
State ex rel. Doolittle v. Hays
45 So. 728 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1907)
State v. Elliott
45 P. 346 (Utah Supreme Court, 1896)
State ex rel. Richardson v. Henderson
22 L.R.A. 751 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1894)
State ex rel. Robert v. Murphy
32 Fla. 138 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1893)
State ex rel. Standish v. Boucher
21 L.R.A. 539 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1893)
State ex rel. Thayer v. Boyd
48 N.W. 739 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1891)
People ex rel. Laine v. Tyrrell
25 P. 684 (California Supreme Court, 1891)
Territory ex rel. Wade v. Ashenfelter
4 N.M. 85 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1887)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 Cal. 407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bissell-cal-1874.