Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Bishop

People v. Bishop

202 A.D.2d 441, 609 N.Y.S.2d 854
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Bishop. Read the opinion of the Court — 206 A.D.2d 884 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 7, 1994·Published

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by her motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), imposed December 3,1992.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Appellate review of the issue raised by the defendant was effectively waived by her as part of her plea bargain (see, People v Allen, 82 NY2d 761; People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1).

We have, however, examined the defendant’s contention that the sentence was excessive and find it to be without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, Miller, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bishop, 202 A.D.2d 441, 609 N.Y.S.2d 854 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

202 A.D.2d 441 (People v. Bishop) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Allen
623 N.E.2d 1170 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
People v. Seaberg
541 N.E.2d 1022 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
People v. Callahan
80 N.Y.2d 273 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Kazepis
101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)