People v. Bishop

202 A.D.2d 441, 609 N.Y.S.2d 854

This text of 202 A.D.2d 441 (People v. Bishop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Bishop, 202 A.D.2d 441, 609 N.Y.S.2d 854 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by her motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), imposed December 3,1992.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Appellate review of the issue raised by the defendant was effectively waived by her as part of her plea bargain (see, People v Allen, 82 NY2d 761; People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1).

We have, however, examined the defendant’s contention that the sentence was excessive and find it to be without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, Miller, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Allen
623 N.E.2d 1170 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
People v. Seaberg
541 N.E.2d 1022 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)
People v. Callahan
80 N.Y.2d 273 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Kazepis
101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
202 A.D.2d 441, 609 N.Y.S.2d 854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bishop-nyappdiv-1994.