People v. Birdsall

20 Johns. 297
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1822
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 20 Johns. 297 (People v. Birdsall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Birdsall, 20 Johns. 297 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1822).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

As to the first point, there seems to be no settled rule of practice; but it appears to be highly reasonable and just, that there should be notice to the sureties, who may have good cause to show why execution should not issue against them. We deny the present motion, without [300]*300costs; but we lay it down as a rule, in future, that notice must be given. We are of opinion, that interest may be collected on the execution, against the Sheriff and his sure™ ties, if the judgment was such as would carry interest under the statute. We will stay the proceedings until the next term, to give the party ah opportunity of producing an affidavit of merits.

Rule accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Herring v. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad
63 How. Pr. 497 (New York Supreme Court, 1882)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 Johns. 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-birdsall-nysupct-1822.